Pedal Commander - WOW

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

dude1782

FRF Addict
Joined
Sep 2, 2016
Posts
1,381
Reaction score
1,176
Location
PHX, AZ/SLO, CA
23270551_1292062574232081_6469267142754539978_o.jpg
 

Smokeshow60

SgtMajor of the MemeCorps
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Posts
692
Reaction score
392
Location
Southern Ohio
Smoke - what do you think it is? How do you explain the better 0-60 times? Go ask @smurfslayer. Those who have the PC report the better 0-60 times. I am not sure what you folks are missing... this is very straightforward.

And how dare you mention @smurfslayer . That dude might slaughter you for that. He doesn't like you. I have a hunch.
 

MGD

Banned
Joined
Oct 14, 2017
Posts
598
Reaction score
84
There are no limitations removed by a pc. No increase in "pedal travel" as you stated (whatever that is) . No additional power, no additional torque. Pc only modifies the pedal sensor input to throttle duty cycle ratio. Period. Any difference in actual performance i.e. 0-60 times etc. are the results of different driving inputs or external conditions including adaptive strategy programming and heatsoak. WOT is WOT in both applications.

That is definitely wrong. Make yourself a new thread asking pedal commander people what they see in difference of 0-60. If you get more throttle than stock ford tuning, that equates to quicker. How can it not be?
 

Smokeshow60

SgtMajor of the MemeCorps
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Posts
692
Reaction score
392
Location
Southern Ohio
That is definitely wrong. Make yourself a new thread asking pedal commander people what they see in difference of 0-60. If you get more throttle than stock ford tuning, that equates to quicker. How can it not be?

No thanks. I think 3 pedal commander threads at once is way more than I can handle. But feel free to post a link here with any credible evidence to support your theory.
 

dude1782

FRF Addict
Joined
Sep 2, 2016
Posts
1,381
Reaction score
1,176
Location
PHX, AZ/SLO, CA
No thanks. I think 3 pedal commander threads at once is way more than I can handle. But feel free to post a link here with any credible evidence to support your theory.



I don’t think Sasquatch has ever done that in his entire frf career so don’t hold your breath.


Sent from my 2017 Raptor using Tapatalk
 
OP
OP
mmacfn

mmacfn

FRF Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2017
Posts
149
Reaction score
48
Location
Show low, AZ
*sigh*

It isnt about learning to drive. Its about the electronic delay built into the stock system.

If pushing the skinny pedal results in a faster response with the PC, which it does, then the vehicle launches quicker than stock. Ergo, the 0-60 is quicker.

Tell me how that isnt accurate.

Driver response time and vehicle performance are two different things. It’s not going to make the truck or any other vehicle faster. Learn to drive
 

dude1782

FRF Addict
Joined
Sep 2, 2016
Posts
1,381
Reaction score
1,176
Location
PHX, AZ/SLO, CA
*sigh*



It isnt about learning to drive. Its about the electronic delay built into the stock system.



If pushing the skinny pedal results in a faster response with the PC, which it does, then the vehicle launches quicker than stock. Ergo, the 0-60 is quicker.



Tell me how that isnt accurate.



They’ll never get it. They don’t have the kind of education required to achieve your level of enlightenment.


Sent from my 2017 Raptor using Tapatalk
 
OP
OP
mmacfn

mmacfn

FRF Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2017
Posts
149
Reaction score
48
Location
Show low, AZ
They might, you likely dont :p

But in reality we need to see the pre and post PC comparison on same truck 0-60 to know if it happens or not.

They’ll never get it. They don’t have the kind of education required to achieve your level of enlightenment.


Sent from my 2017 Raptor using Tapatalk
 
Top