Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
RAM TRX - TRX-Forum.com
Bronco Raptor - BroncoRaptorForum.com
Forums
GEN 1 (2010-2014) Ford SVT Raptor Forums
Ford Raptor Engine Discussion and Performance Mods
Procharger Stage II vs HO Intercooler
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Canuck714" data-source="post: 1737005" data-attributes="member: 6707"><p>The points you are making for going to Pro-Charger are exactly why I was asking. Not to deter you from going that way, but i have seen way more isses with that setup than any other. The tune is critically imprortant on the procharger vs the Whipple or Roush. They seem to build boost in a way the PCM can not compute. [USER=499]@MTF[/USER] has a good explanation for the issue.</p><p></p><p>I had 125,000 boosted miles on my 14 and never felt that the engine was being overworked. Although I do believe the Roush may be a little easier on the 6.2 VS a Pro-Charger just because a PC needs RPM to make power. You have to run it harder to get the same power.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Canuck714, post: 1737005, member: 6707"] The points you are making for going to Pro-Charger are exactly why I was asking. Not to deter you from going that way, but i have seen way more isses with that setup than any other. The tune is critically imprortant on the procharger vs the Whipple or Roush. They seem to build boost in a way the PCM can not compute. [USER=499]@MTF[/USER] has a good explanation for the issue. I had 125,000 boosted miles on my 14 and never felt that the engine was being overworked. Although I do believe the Roush may be a little easier on the 6.2 VS a Pro-Charger just because a PC needs RPM to make power. You have to run it harder to get the same power. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
BlueRecaro19
PNTitBLK
pirates1456
FordTechOne
stevenstommyboy1
FP Forged
Coyote_695
AMillertime
KAJRIP
970rap
Neddy
elpechedepeche
Jmeo
encyphered
jAKe47
23f150
Gotdesl
Adrenlin
jgraptor90
jekyll537
bobbyph1
SurfRaptor
downforce137
MurderedOutSVT
petrolhead
RaptorFun
dirtslinger
GCATX
Swacer_2
HighwaySentinel
alockbox
VJDWashington
Bozz
Irregular F150
figure1a
krmzn
Powerlies
bigjerry
GooseTuned
donttellmywiferacing
nelsonr103
zaiiake
Utexmed
Reaper308
CleverGirl_
Monte87
TomDirt
SuprSeb
DMacDonald
NJ2020
... and 27 more.
Forum statistics
Threads
93,169
Posts
1,955,226
Members
56,440
Latest member
jumpcutter
Forums
GEN 1 (2010-2014) Ford SVT Raptor Forums
Ford Raptor Engine Discussion and Performance Mods
Procharger Stage II vs HO Intercooler
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top