Motor Trend truck of the year - F150 stats you won’t believe!

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

photoneffect

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2017
Posts
416
Reaction score
303
Location
Delaware
While this is true, the trap speed is very telling. While a better driver might be able to pull a better time, this is largely due to knowing how to launch the vehicle. Trap speed is largely unaffected by a good or not so good launch. The Raptor being a Raptor is laden with quite a bit more weight, not to mention drag and the power advantage it enjoys isn't enough to overcome the additional mass it carries.

Except that’s not really true based on real world data. There have been multiple guys posting slips from the track in the high 90s and I’ve heard at least one who inched his way up above 100 with a very good launch. I’d call that a pretty big difference. I guess the actual weather and track conditions are going to play a role in this, but why is Motortrend always so bad at this stuff? Reminds me of the time TFL wouldn’t use launch control to time the GTR because they said it wasn’t a real test. I get the Raptor isn’t a drag car and I could give two craps if a stock F150 lights it up all day, but it’s just baffling how bad these guys are at the automotive part of the automotive journalism.
 
OP
OP
MGD

MGD

Banned
Joined
Oct 14, 2017
Posts
598
Reaction score
84
So if they were bad at driving the raptor, does that mean they were also bad at driving the 5L? This test is a good apples to apples comparison so that you see each offering in the same test conditions.
 

Smokeshow60

SgtMajor of the MemeCorps
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Posts
692
Reaction score
392
Location
Southern Ohio
So if they were bad at driving the raptor, does that mean they were also bad at driving the 5L? This test is a good apples to apples comparison so that you see each offering in the same test conditions.

It's highly disturbing but I'll credit you with making a valid point. Ughh. Can't believe I just typed that.
 

1phatstang

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2016
Posts
228
Reaction score
234
Location
Kansas
I found it interesting that the pictures of the Raptor tested aren't even an '18 model - Avalanche Gray is not available on an '18.
 

Jmorris

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2017
Posts
59
Reaction score
38
Simple as this. Take a Raptor... remove the eco. Throw in the "glorious 5.0 V8". Truck would be a much slower running down the 1/4 mile. But it would sound good haha.....
 

photoneffect

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2017
Posts
416
Reaction score
303
Location
Delaware
So if they were bad at driving the raptor, does that mean they were also bad at driving the 5L? This test is a good apples to apples comparison so that you see each offering in the same test conditions.

Probably, but given the superior torque curve and beefier tires of the Raptor I’d imagine the Raptor loses more by a bad launch than the other. But that’s a bit of a guess.

More to the point you don’t artificially be bad at doing two things and then claim it’s a good comparison of those things. If that were the case you would test both by sending a fifth grader out to do it and say “well it’s an even test”. There’s always going to be bias and variables, but you try to remove them best as possible. When I see a time that is so far below what it should be I think the tester loses credibility.
 

Jmorris

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2017
Posts
59
Reaction score
38
Another scenario.... take the 5.0 V8 f150. Throw a lift on it, throw 35's on it and put enough sacks of sand in the back to make it same weight as raptor. Be slow as shit but hey it would sound awesome!!
 

jabroni619

FRF Addict
Joined
Jun 13, 2017
Posts
2,057
Reaction score
1,419
Except that’s not really true based on real world data. There have been multiple guys posting slips from the track in the high 90s and I’ve heard at least one who inched his way up above 100 with a very good launch. I’d call that a pretty big difference. I guess the actual weather and track conditions are going to play a role in this, but why is Motortrend always so bad at this stuff? Reminds me of the time TFL wouldn’t use launch control to time the GTR because they said it wasn’t a real test. I get the Raptor isn’t a drag car and I could give two craps if a stock F150 lights it up all day, but it’s just baffling how bad these guys are at the automotive part of the automotive journalism.

Even if true, it was the same drivers driving all the vehicles.
 

Sharkus29

Full Access Member
Joined
May 9, 2014
Posts
260
Reaction score
114
Location
Kickin it in Canada!

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
93,180
Posts
1,955,513
Members
56,460
Latest member
khunter
Top