Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
RAM TRX - TRX-Forum.com
Bronco Raptor - BroncoRaptorForum.com
Forums
GEN 2 (2017-2020) Ford F-150 Raptor Forums
Ford F-150 Raptor General Discussions [GEN 2]
by my math....this covid19 crap has kept 1,500 miles off my truck
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="smurfslayer" data-source="post: 1464666" data-attributes="member: 21926"><p>pretty sure a previous poster already mentioned tesla, other electric vehicles, solar and wind energy, nuclear. It’s not like the 70’s, we’re doing a lot of this.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>where is the evidence this is caused by - what are we talking about here climate change or global warming, that was never clarified. Do warmer winters from El Nino more than make up for more frequent and damaging weather events? are El Nino and la nina naturally occurring weather events or are they similarly caused by humans? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I realize a lot of previous posters leaned in a bit, but this just isn’t a cogent argument or disagreement. It’s over the top hyperbole that simply undercuts statements you made previously that maybe had some credibility to them. You could have stricken the political portions, and still made your point</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think part of the disconnect that partisans suffer from is what is considered ’science’. Is it conclusory facts that were achieved via the scientific method OR is it peer reviewed assumptive predictions? Like, say ... meteorology? You see, part of the Nasa conclusions concern periods of time before recorded history and while I can fathom that it’s possible to know and understand certain things about the past, i have a hard time reaching the conclusion that temperature is one of them, particularly with the precision that they can say there were definitive differences in temperature. I can be convinced, but i have a hard time buying it. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Climate-gate. Peer reviewed means very little when your echo chamber peer reviews your “work” by making sure it’s messaged to achieve the desired outcome. There’s scientific method and there’s the politically motivated studies with conclusions established and research developed to support the conclusion. The latter gets peer reviewed too. </p><p></p><p>Sciencey. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course. spend time behind a bus rolling coal and tell me honestly that’s good for human health. I was stuck behind some oil and diesel belching delivery truck in Italy with alleys so tight he had to retract his mirrors - and no way to pass. I ended up having to stop the fumes were so bad. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Right and the credibility of the scientific community suffered huge as more and more people began calling these studies into question with some success. Just like one bad cop poisons the rep for all boys in blue, a single unethical scientist undoes the credibility of the community; a community that makes its bones on dispassionate analysis and study.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="smurfslayer, post: 1464666, member: 21926"] pretty sure a previous poster already mentioned tesla, other electric vehicles, solar and wind energy, nuclear. It’s not like the 70’s, we’re doing a lot of this. where is the evidence this is caused by - what are we talking about here climate change or global warming, that was never clarified. Do warmer winters from El Nino more than make up for more frequent and damaging weather events? are El Nino and la nina naturally occurring weather events or are they similarly caused by humans? I realize a lot of previous posters leaned in a bit, but this just isn’t a cogent argument or disagreement. It’s over the top hyperbole that simply undercuts statements you made previously that maybe had some credibility to them. You could have stricken the political portions, and still made your point I think part of the disconnect that partisans suffer from is what is considered ’science’. Is it conclusory facts that were achieved via the scientific method OR is it peer reviewed assumptive predictions? Like, say ... meteorology? You see, part of the Nasa conclusions concern periods of time before recorded history and while I can fathom that it’s possible to know and understand certain things about the past, i have a hard time reaching the conclusion that temperature is one of them, particularly with the precision that they can say there were definitive differences in temperature. I can be convinced, but i have a hard time buying it. Climate-gate. Peer reviewed means very little when your echo chamber peer reviews your “work” by making sure it’s messaged to achieve the desired outcome. There’s scientific method and there’s the politically motivated studies with conclusions established and research developed to support the conclusion. The latter gets peer reviewed too. Sciencey. Of course. spend time behind a bus rolling coal and tell me honestly that’s good for human health. I was stuck behind some oil and diesel belching delivery truck in Italy with alleys so tight he had to retract his mirrors - and no way to pass. I ended up having to stop the fumes were so bad. Right and the credibility of the scientific community suffered huge as more and more people began calling these studies into question with some success. Just like one bad cop poisons the rep for all boys in blue, a single unethical scientist undoes the credibility of the community; a community that makes its bones on dispassionate analysis and study. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
scroper
Corsarych
vill
nelsonr103
JD05
SuprSeb
RaptorR81
Forum statistics
Threads
93,180
Posts
1,955,511
Members
56,460
Latest member
khunter
Forums
GEN 2 (2017-2020) Ford F-150 Raptor Forums
Ford F-150 Raptor General Discussions [GEN 2]
by my math....this covid19 crap has kept 1,500 miles off my truck
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top