Search results

Nice! Snowflake!

You’re another fuckwit who doesn’t know WTF it’s talking about. I won’t go into my experience and success at building and racing “engines” because it would take up way too much space. Why is this forum chock full of idiots and only a small handful of people who have a clue? Oh I get it...

The 36 gallon tank makes a difference. You don’t want that side stiffer to account for a full tank because the height and damping would not be correct with light fuel load.

Hmmmm? I’m thinking this halfwit snowflake reported my post calling him(?) out as a fuckwit because the language police software hasn’t been updated to include fuckwit as a banned word. I find it quite odd that dipshit snowflakes like ole ‘Squatch can persist for years spouting out lies and...

Yep, that’s why the problem needs specific clarification. The IWE is the first suspect, but if they aren’t the problem, then the suspension bushings, ball joint(s), and/of tie rod(s) are loose. It’s all pretty simple really, if it is only under hard acceleration in 4wd.

Are you guys talking about a “drift” to the right that requires a pressure on the wheel on crowned roads OR a hard pull that requires significant effort to counter?

Baja Designs are the best in the lighting business. That’s why my truck has their unlimited kit.

Yeah, go back and check your ECU with FORScan to make sure all the "as-built" modules are correct. Something was done that the ECU doesn't like, so it must be taken back to original configuration. When you are sure the ECU is original, then you can proceed. If you/dealer flashed over it...

Not at all. The brakes are likely the same as the regular F-150, but I haven't confirmed that. The Raptor weighs significantly more than the regular truck, plus as you mentioned above, the rear suspension is soft(er) and long travel which upsets the stability, especially under maximum braking...

Yup, didn't say it was "legal", just something you can do to help the capacity

...and note that most folks think the maximum load/weights are for protecting the chassis and/or engine. However, it's main purpose is to keep the vehicle within the maximum rated stopping distance. If you have upgraded brakes the weight carry could be increased. The tongue weight is...

WTF? Looks like just another fuckwit on the forum, but you can’t go wrong with the Cobb setup.

Enjoy your ignorance, for sure. Bless your heart, I know you can't help it. You know, with your cognition problems and all. You may want to run spell check too, since you misspelled idiot...

You fuckwits should know that you cause more wear and "stress" on the engine within the first 5 to 15 minutes of cold (near freezing and below) starts than a 25% power increase at normal operating temps. Maybe we should delve just a bit into the physics of the slight increase in perceived...

There is some validity to this sentence as the overwhelming majority of forum posters are fuckwits with whom I have lost all patience. I deal in facts where most like you deal in “feels”, so your entire point is invalid.

Yep, such it the case with modern forced induction. Just don't exceed the tiny turbo's turbine exhaust flow capability and everything is great!

Yes, the baro adds to all the runs. 12.4 is awfully low! I live right at sea level and most days are 14.6 and some at 14.8 with a high pressure area over us. The DynoJet data display will show the correction factor as a decimal number as well, with 1.00 meaning no corrections and anything...

What's the altitude above sea level there at the dyno facility? SAE adds quite a bit to the forced induction numbers. Your improvements based off of the before and after runs are certainly legit as they're both run with the SAE corrections, but still the numbers you're getting on the 91...

Well, at least there are some people on here that aren't fuckwits. @Trackar understands the concept and answered fuckwit2 quite admirably. I had decided I wasn't going to answer the "demand" by fuckwit2 because..., well just a fuckwit. I will elaborate just a little bit. Most engines in the...

I am one of those guys, so... You know, the engineer with common sense... Bless your heart. You fuckwits don't keep a vehicle long enough to even understand what "premature wear" is and where it may actually occur.

That is precisely what I'm saying. If you actually understood where the increased loads are applied, you wouldn't be so stupid.

Yeah, I understand the situation. I also believe you could win the case if it went to jury, but it really isn’t worth the effort. This is precisely why Ford and all oems will initially push back just to see if your serious about litigation. Hell, even medical insurance providers do the same...

Uhmm, that's the way it works on my 2017 Focus RS. If you disconnect the battery for several minutes to allow the capacitive volatile memory to bleed down, all that type of info is reset to zero. The way the dealer questions whether you "had" a tune on the vehicle is with the number of key...

You know, if you internet forum savvy(not really...) folks would simply go to Cobb's web site and look around a bit you would find ALL of these questions would be answered before they were asked... I'm amazed, well not so much any more, how people an be so inept and dependent as to ask complete...

Yes. The #1 functional item missing from the Cobb Tuning solution at this point is the transmission tuning that’s available from other “tuners”. I have the Cobb AP, but I’m waiting for them to step up and provide their AccessTuner tuning software and then the trans tuning capability before I...