Maybe 511 HP? Does that change your feeling.

Rated R · Mar 5, 2016

My point about the 900K F-150's is, when they started on the 511 hp kick ass engine in the new Gen II, they had a headwind. It was not a clean sheet of paper. Most of those who have a modicum of intelligence can understand that.

SlimChaChi · Mar 5, 2016

Rated R said:
My point about the 900K F-150's is, when they started on the 511 hp kick ass engine in the new Gen II, they had a headwind. It was not a clean sheet of paper. Most of those who have a modicum of intelligence can understand that.

i'll ignore the fact you even threw 511hp out there...you're not proving anything by referencing an old engine in order to back the new one...they're completely different, just like ford and most everyone here has said, how is the old 3.5L relevant to arguments pertaining to the new one?

Rbernard1984 · Mar 5, 2016

SlimChaChi said:
i'll ignore the fact you even through 511hp out there...you're not proving anything by referencing an old engine in order to back the new one...they're completely different, just like ford and most everyone here has said, how is the old 3.5L relevant to arguments pertaining to the new one?

We have established the engine is all new, but the design is not, there are a ton of V1 EB engines out there. It is essentially V2 of a previous design, Ford went back to the drawing board on a lot of details and appears to be correcting issues that many V1 EB guys found when pushing the engines hard.

So, you both are correct. It is an all new engine AND there are a lot of EB engines out there for data that Ford is using to build this new one. Lets be happy they are evolving and not just throwing the old version in :happy107:

SlimChaChi · Mar 5, 2016

Rbernard1984 said:
We have established the engine is all new, but the design is not, there are a ton of V1 EB engines out there. It is essentially V2 of a previous design, Ford went back to the drawing board on a lot of details and appears to be correcting issues that many V1 EB guys found when pushing the engines hard.

So, you both are correct. It is an all new engine AND there are a lot of EB engines out there for data that Ford is using to build this new one. Lets be happy they are evolving and not just throwing the old version in

haha, I think I said V2 in a previous post and got shit on also...I'm going back to using quotes **** it.

ovrlnd · Mar 5, 2016

SlimChaChi said:
how is the old 3.5L relevant to arguments pertaining to the new one?

It has the same lousy intercooler location?

Rbernard1984 · Mar 5, 2016

Did anyone see the HPkings article talking about a possible 5.0 EB? My buddy didnt say the 511 goal was a 3.5, maybe there will be two engines? 430 for the 3.5 like some have said and 511 for the 5.0?

---------- Post added at 05:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:16 PM ----------

ovrlnd said:
It has the same lousy intercooler location?

Yeah the location makes me nervous.

Wilson · Mar 5, 2016

a 5.0 would blow past the 511

Boricuaevo8 · Mar 5, 2016

Well shit, if that's the case, I need to wait on the 5.0 ha... The glorious 3.5/5.0 talk.... it will never end. :okay2:

pirate air · Mar 5, 2016

My gen 1 still kicks your gen 2s ass... FACT!!!

Wilson · Mar 5, 2016

my gen1 will lick you're jen2 right in the pussyhole

Maybe 511 HP? Does that change your feeling.

What is your feeling on the HP?

I like the truck no matter what, over 500 is just gravy

I like the truck, but less then 500 might make me reconsider

I don't like the truck, but over 500 would change my feeling

I don't like the truck, doesn't matter the HP number

Rated R

Full Access Member

SlimChaChi

FRF Addict

Rbernard1984

Member

SlimChaChi

FRF Addict

ovrlnd

Full Access Member

Rbernard1984

Member

Wilson

FRF Addict

Boricuaevo8

Full Access Member

pirate air

will plunder your booty

Wilson

FRF Addict

Similar threads

Members online

Forum statistics

Latest posts