GEN 2 Costco vs Synergy+ Gas Comparison

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

wmb3

Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Posts
39
Reaction score
11
Location
St. Louis and Milwaukee
Costco vs Synergy+ Gas Comparison


Mobil/Exxon recently introduced a new premium fuel with a 93-octane rating and no ethanol. They are making several claims about this new fuel blend including cleaner engines, better fuel economy and better engine performance. I decide to compare my Stock 25,000-mile 2018 Gen 2 Raptor with my normal Costco premium gas to the new Synergy fuel.


My Current Fuel Economy is as follows:



Costco 91 with ethanol Synergy+ 93


Hwy fuel economy 18.5 mpg 20 mpg (Ave speed 65 mph on cruise control)


City fuel economy 17 mpg 18 mpg


For the performance claim my comparison will be subjective. I drive under the ”Normal” mode with a 50/50 mix of city and highway driving. I would say that I am a slower, speed limit driver with auto stop/start engaged. However, I did notice an increase in performance. My acceleration, especially when merging on to the highway and passing other drivers seemed more spirited. For the cleaner engine claim, I have no way to test. Since both fuels are ”Top Tier” fuels I will call it a tie.


Now for the price difference. In my area Costco fuel is $2.68 per gallon while Synergy+ is $3.03 for a difference of .35 per gallon. Total difference per fill-up is $12.60. With an average fuel economy of 17.75 mpg under Costco and 19 mpg fuel economy under Synergy+ for a difference of 1.25 mpg. Total increase in mileage per tank is 45 miles (36 gallons x 1.25).

With a cost of $12.60 vs mileage improvement of $7.18 (45 miles/19= 2.3 gallons @ $3.03 per gallon) for a difference of $5.42 for each fill-up from empty.


Tell me your thoughts. Do you agree with my analysis and my math? I am going to switch from Costco to Synergy+ when I can. I am thinking that the higher octane and with no ethanol, it may be a better fuel. Also, with the performance improvement Synergy+ is worth the extra costs. Please respond with your observations. Has anyone else tried Synergy+?
 

jzweedyk

FRF Addict
Joined
Jun 30, 2018
Posts
2,315
Reaction score
4,499
Location
Moab/Winter Travel/Summer Travel
It's a $70K truck. Why not get the best performance and mileage you can. It may even help the engine (cleaner) a little. To me it is a no brainer, go with the best. It isn't $ 5.42 each fill up unless you run out of gas and totally fill the tank. If that makes enough of a difference to you, you should get a Prius.
 

bvlaw

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Posts
103
Reaction score
112
Very thorough analysis. I would use it if I could but there aren't any Exxon/Mobil stations near me.
 

goblues38

FRF Addict
Joined
Oct 27, 2018
Posts
2,659
Reaction score
3,823
Location
STL
Hwy fuel economy 18.5 mpg 20 mpg (Ave speed 65 mph on cruise control)


City fuel economy 17 mpg 18 mpg

That is the deal right there. I can get 20mpg setting the cruise at 65mph on flat ground. As soon as you go to 66mph and higher, this truck starts to use boost and fuel like a ****** uses birth control.

Setting the cruise at 67mph drops the MPGs down to 16 real quick.

I always use premium, so have no comment on cheaper gas giving lower economy, but that has always been my belief.
 

Donovan

FRF Addict
Joined
Aug 10, 2019
Posts
4,485
Reaction score
4,363
Location
DC
That is the deal right there. I can get 20mpg setting the cruise at 65mph on flat ground. As soon as you go to 66mph and higher, this truck starts to use boost and fuel like a ****** uses birth control.

Setting the cruise at 67mph drops the MPGs down to 16 real quick.

I always use premium, so have no comment on cheaper gas giving lower economy, but that has always been my belief.

Whew, not the hookers, let them live sir..
*aimlessly throws $1s*

Someone tell my wife I'm at a late meeting... thx........
 

df4801

FRF Addict
Joined
Nov 9, 2016
Posts
1,124
Reaction score
910
That is the deal right there. I can get 20mpg setting the cruise at 65mph on flat ground. As soon as you go to 66mph and higher, this truck starts to use boost and fuel like a ****** uses birth control.

Setting the cruise at 67mph drops the MPGs down to 16 real quick.

I always use premium, so have no comment on cheaper gas giving lower economy, but that has always been my belief.


at 65 mph, you get 20 mpg....

but at 67 mph, you get 16 mpg...


Uhhh, ok chief! Whatever you say!
 

goblues38

FRF Addict
Joined
Oct 27, 2018
Posts
2,659
Reaction score
3,823
Location
STL
at 65 mph, you get 20 mpg....

but at 67 mph, you get 16 mpg...


Uhhh, ok chief! Whatever you say!


Not just in this truck, but in our explorer sport. the 3.5 ecoboost is tuned to be very lean cruising at 65ph. I have 150,000 miles of experience with this motor.....MPG falls off a cliff right around 66 mph.
 

Refugio

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2019
Posts
182
Reaction score
94
Location
South Texas
Not just in this truck, but in our explorer sport. the 3.5 ecoboost is tuned to be very lean cruising at 65ph. I have 150,000 miles of experience with this motor.....MPG falls off a cliff right around 66 mph.
I agree 100%.
My other vehicles respond about the same way
 

Tr4ckD4ys

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2019
Posts
229
Reaction score
189
Location
Midwest
I'm just so surprised at everyone's gas mileages here. I live in the chicago suburbs, spend 70% on highway and 30% on city/suburb roads. With 3000 miles on the raptor, I can hardly get beyond 16 mpg overall average. I'm clocking in at 15.8 most times...
Now mpg's are so subjective so I'm sure I could go even lower, but the reality is that similar to the op of this post, I don't drive aggressively at all...
 
Top