Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
RAM TRX - TRX-Forum.com
Bronco Raptor - BroncoRaptorForum.com
Forums
GEN 2 (2017-2020) Ford F-150 Raptor Forums
Ford Raptor Engine Discussion and Performance Mods
2 raptors 2017 were tested on dyno today ..
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bombsquad68" data-source="post: 1132921" data-attributes="member: 20615"><p>That applies for Mustangs, Dyno Dynamics, Superflow, not inertial Dynojets. Those are Eddy current dynos, energy is absorbed by an electric power absorption unit. These read all over the map because the units vary between brands, and a Mustang will usually read 10-12% lower than a Dynojet when properly calibrated. The benefit to these is that you can perform steady state load testing or help you increase load artificially to spool turbos. But these EC dynos at crappy shops are also where the BS that dyno numbers are useless beyond a single dyno and vehicle come from.</p><p></p><p>A true inertial dyno like a Dynojet 224, 240C, 424, uses a fixed load (the roller) and it doesn't matter if it's in Alabama or Saudi Arabia, you're moving the same load and it's easy to operate. That's why guys in legit performance forums like LS1tech will readily compare Dynojet numbers, it's pretty legit unless you're running big turbos and need load for spooling or have traction issues.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bombsquad68, post: 1132921, member: 20615"] That applies for Mustangs, Dyno Dynamics, Superflow, not inertial Dynojets. Those are Eddy current dynos, energy is absorbed by an electric power absorption unit. These read all over the map because the units vary between brands, and a Mustang will usually read 10-12% lower than a Dynojet when properly calibrated. The benefit to these is that you can perform steady state load testing or help you increase load artificially to spool turbos. But these EC dynos at crappy shops are also where the BS that dyno numbers are useless beyond a single dyno and vehicle come from. A true inertial dyno like a Dynojet 224, 240C, 424, uses a fixed load (the roller) and it doesn't matter if it's in Alabama or Saudi Arabia, you're moving the same load and it's easy to operate. That's why guys in legit performance forums like LS1tech will readily compare Dynojet numbers, it's pretty legit unless you're running big turbos and need load for spooling or have traction issues. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
HighSpeedLowDrag
never_summer
Rednose
carlos0001025
thatJeepguy
Forum statistics
Threads
93,202
Posts
1,955,937
Members
56,485
Latest member
bjorn-dpc
Forums
GEN 2 (2017-2020) Ford F-150 Raptor Forums
Ford Raptor Engine Discussion and Performance Mods
2 raptors 2017 were tested on dyno today ..
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top