GEN 2 Catch can

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

HotLap

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2018
Posts
416
Reaction score
167
Location
SoCal
As stated above, nature of the beast - life with forced induction. Not sure about the Raptor but on both my 3.5EB KR and 5.2L FPC you only really need the catch can for the passenger side. I check about every 1K miles and might have 1.5oz in the cans - so no serious impact on the oil level(s). My main concern was not allowing the oil saturated air flowing back through the intake and building up on back side of intake valve. This was supposed to be remedied by Ford with the 2017 model Eco Boost (3.5 non Raptor)engines by going with both direct and port injection...
 

Truckzor

FRF Addict
Joined
Feb 17, 2013
Posts
2,419
Reaction score
1,383
Not sure about the Raptor but on both my 3.5EB KR and 5.2L FPC you only really need the catch can for the passenger side.

Supercharged 6.2 here. I haven't gotten any oil out of my driver's side can. I was told this before installing by the guys on this forum but I decided to go ahead with it out of an abundance of caution. As I plan to keep this truck long term I wanted to keep it running clean. Now that I have seen for myself I would probably skip the 2nd can. But I don't know how these new higher pressure high output 3.5s are with this issue.
 

donk_316

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2016
Posts
133
Reaction score
27
Location
Edmonton
I ran one in my SC G1 and it would catch gallons of crap.
I ran one in a 2013 Ecoboost and it catched a decent amount.

I don’t run one on the G2 ecoboost yet.
 

Truckzor

FRF Addict
Joined
Feb 17, 2013
Posts
2,419
Reaction score
1,383
What are the actual numbers on a g2?

How much oil are you actually finding?

http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f260...aptor-supercrew-57315/index5.html#post1206126

http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f261/anybody-installed-whipple-tune-yet-59177/index3.html#post1229322

http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f261...-delivery-1500-miles-later-56178/#post1179000

Again, this is not going to be enough to wreck your engine, especially with the port injection (hope you guys are running your Techron!) but if you plan to keep the truck more than a few years you really want to keep this junk out of your intake and off your valves.
 

HotLap

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2018
Posts
416
Reaction score
167
Location
SoCal
http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f260...aptor-supercrew-57315/index5.html#post1206126

http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f261/anybody-installed-whipple-tune-yet-59177/index3.html#post1229322

http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f261...-delivery-1500-miles-later-56178/#post1179000

Again, this is not going to be enough to wreck your engine, especially with the port injection (hope you guys are running your Techron!) but if you plan to keep the truck more than a few years you really want to keep this junk out of your intake and off your valves.

Agreed, cheap insurance in my book!
 

reaper1441

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2018
Posts
350
Reaction score
206
I understand what your saying and agree.
I just think a catch can would be installed as an OEM . Don’t they feel the damage it causes will shorten the life of the engine . Maybe they want that



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

its next to impossible to get a OEM catch can approved for street use on a production vehicle for environmental reasons. Also no one at corporate wants a small disgusting gooey can that requires periodic draining to be added to the list of maintenance items when no one else on the market requires it. Despite its benefits.
The only disadvantage to the factory PCV system is decreased intercooler efficiency in high mileage engines as they start to be coated with oil. The factory PCV system also (on paper) has the ability to PRODUCE more hp because of the negative crank case pressure vs a catch can or a VTA system.
 

RaptorMaryland

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2017
Posts
739
Reaction score
356
Location
Maryland
http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f260...aptor-supercrew-57315/index5.html#post1206126

http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f261/anybody-installed-whipple-tune-yet-59177/index3.html#post1229322

http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f261...-delivery-1500-miles-later-56178/#post1179000

Again, this is not going to be enough to wreck your engine, especially with the port injection (hope you guys are running your Techron!) but if you plan to keep the truck more than a few years you really want to keep this junk out of your intake and off your valves.

I agree if there is real data.

I keep my cars to 200K miles and this is a $500 project that no one can supply the ROI numbers.

1. Real data on oil used or "Catched" is good to know.

2. Can the engine go to 200K (No can) and what is the damage at say 150K miles with out installing a catch can?
 

reaper1441

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2018
Posts
350
Reaction score
206
As stated above, nature of the beast - life with forced induction. Not sure about the Raptor but on both my 3.5EB KR and 5.2L FPC you only really need the catch can for the passenger side. I check about every 1K miles and might have 1.5oz in the cans - so no serious impact on the oil level(s). My main concern was not allowing the oil saturated air flowing back through the intake and building up on back side of intake valve. This was supposed to be remedied by Ford with the 2017 model Eco Boost (3.5 non Raptor)engines by going with both direct and port injection...

oil pulled through the intake by the factory PCV system will never cause valve problems on the new EB engines since it has a port injector spraying the backside of the valve keeping it clean. This was HUUUGE problem with direct injected only cars like BMW, Subaru (FA20DIT), early Toyotas(lexus) ETC where they were DI ONLY cars and there was no port injector to spray the back of the valve clean. Our biggest problem is coating the inside of the intercooler with oil over time.

---------- Post added at 12:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:41 PM ----------

the factory PCV system will have almost zero impact on engine life other than lowering the efficiency of the intercooler marginally at high mileage on a truck that isn't raced regularly. The catch can is a good idea because the intercooler essentially acts as a catch can in the factory system. Separating moisture from the oil vapor. But it has zero impact on engine life either way.
The reason we run catch cans on our race engines is because the oil vapor can cause a fluctuation on the octane rating in extreme extreme cases. and we need every scrap of intercooler efficiency we can get do to size constraints.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
93,145
Posts
1,954,674
Members
56,419
Latest member
TwistAir
Top