MTF
FRF Addict
I'm sure it was either a non SC Roush package or a stage 1 and the guy didn't know how to drive it
or it could have had just stickers, people do that you know.
Supercharged 6.2 VS Twin Turbo Ecoboost Raptor
- Thread starter Canuck714
- Start date
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
I'm sure it was either a non SC Roush package or a stage 1 and the guy didn't know how to drive it
or it could have had just stickers, people do that you know.
OP
OP
Canuck714
FRF Addict
I'm the OP... what is the question?
Wouldn't take much with some of the race cars out there.
OP
OP
Canuck714
FRF Addict
lol.. thanks
It appears to me, that my comment was directed at a different video than the one thast are here now! Was it changed?
tplee
Full Access Member
Let me help everyone out here... the math is actually somewhat easy: 6.2 > 3.5. A 3.5 will NEVER be able to out power a 6.2 of given the ability to make corresponding adjustments.
---------- Post added at 04:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:27 PM ----------
Because I'm PO'd Ford isn't making '17+ with a V8 option... And I'm gonna keep whining about it.
---------- Post added at 04:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:27 PM ----------
Why can't you Gen1 owners just enjoy what you have instead of acting like 12 year olds all butt hurt because Ford produced a 2nd generation Raptor that is superior? Life evolves, time passes and your insecurities are making you guys act like jealous GM/Chevy and Dodge owners.
Because I'm PO'd Ford isn't making '17+ with a V8 option... And I'm gonna keep whining about it.
WhatExit?
FRF Addict
**** already! Who ******* cares?! Do you wish the 747 was still flying? How about the Porsche Boxster going with a turbo 4 instead of a 6 cylinder?
tplee
Full Access Member
Because twin turb'ing a 6 is somehow an advancement in technology? We've been force feeding baby motors for several decades. It's nothing new. What's wrong with wanting better power plant options than a puny 3.5L?
And the 7-4 is certainly still flying and will be for a long time to come.... And so is the venerable B-52. What's your point? If you're asking if I prefer classic cars over new, I certainly do, albeit with modern muscle...and certainly NEVER a V6. I could give a crap less about a Porsche.
Last edited:
Brandon###
Member
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2016
- Posts
- 33
- Reaction score
- 8
If you had to choose between G Bodies which would you choose? A Monte Carlo SS with a SBC or an 86-87 Buick Grand National?
Similar threads
Members online
- shigman
- FossilFuel
- nicewaptor
- Ice Man
- BigPig
- lsnow8
- BadWRP
- winning
- MCrump
- downforce137
- n00dler
- CDN_Raptor
- vill
- Zach Gen3
- RaptorMach3p5
- The Doo
- Hard R
- Celis02
- eljefe_tx
- icecoldak
- DHeav
- Edder
- Mossy 150
- never_summer
- bilegt
- zachery55
- BBLV
- burlybear
- ttatew
- kevo_lo
- HookEm
- GCATX
- mark8e
- LayinWatts69
- elking
- Smoky18Raptor
- KMO
- alphablue
- highwhey
- Brody Goble
- catinthehat85
- joeyrotorhead
- TAZRaptor
- Davez134
- turdbo3
- Solidred
